|
For a bookmark-friendly version of this page, click here. Then bookmark this page.
Getting Away with Success: Ideas for Teachers
by Jane Bluestein, Ph.D.
Note: The following is a preview of new material included in the
revision of the book 21st
Century Discipline (3rd edition, due fall of 2006).
When we look back over the traditions from which our current school practices
arose, we can see a system that practically guarantees failure for at
least a portion of our students. Maybe it made some sense, when the majority
of our students were heading to factory-era jobs, to stress the importance
of uniformity as much as our schools did. And nowhere is this value more
evident—still!—than in our obsession with standards and standardization.
Even without disputing the questionable importance of everything we believe
all children should know or be able to do, the notion that we should be
able to walk into any group of eighth graders, for example, and teach
them all the same concept at the same time and expect uniform mastery
is certainly not based in the reality of any group of human beings I’ve
ever met. Throw in our attachment to the good old bell curve and we end
up with a lot of kids left out of the loop.
One of the unfortunate places to which these traditions lead is the expectations
that teachers’ evaluations reflect a normal distribution (that is,
bell-shaped curve) of grades. As much as we may talk about wanting all
children to succeed, you can be sure if you have too many successful kids
in your class, somebody is going to be on your case for not doing your
job. Still, even in a highly structured (or even repressive) system, there
are things we can do to, yes, get away with success.
- Assess what your students already know. If they can already demonstrate
mastery, you’ve got justification for moving them ahead. If they
lack prerequisite skills, you have something to back up your decision
to teach what they need.
- Document like there’s no tomorrow. Good documentation is more
than a sign of professionalism and accountability. It also helps to
protect your administration, whose support can be invaluable in actually
matching your instruction to the needs of your students. Keep track
of assessments, dates specific skills were mastered, work samples, progress.
- Move along the lines of district-mandated curriculum. If you have
to back up the content you’re teaching or choose to include content
that is not listed in the mandates for your grade level or subject area,
working within what’s already established in the system can give
you more leverage than arbitrarily choosing skills or content to teach.
- Maintain high levels of performance as your criteria for achievement.
Continue raising hurdles as kids make progress. You can fend off charges
of “lowering the bar” or grade inflation when you keep pushing
and refuse to accept inferior or sub-standard work based on your assessment
of what is possible for a particular class, group or individual to do.
- Back up decisions with research that will support your instructional
choices—anything about how kids learn, or how they learn that
particular content, can help.
- Build relationships and communication with your administration, department,
support staff and grade-level colleagues.
- Build relationships with parents. I never had a parent insist on a
placement that would guarantee failure for his or her child. And once
they saw evidence of success, achievement, progress or even enthusiasm
for my class, I found parental support to be one of the best weapons
in the arsenal.
- Keep your intentions in mind. If you are there to ensure that your
students gain knowledge and proficiency, you will choose very different
behaviors than if you just want to barrel through the curriculum.
- Be willing to take a few hits. Bucking tradition can cost you some
conflict or disapproval from colleagues.
Read excerpts from 21st Century Discipline:
More information about the current edition of 21st
Century Discipline.
Order
this book.
Back
For a bookmark-friendly version of this page, click here. Then bookmark this page.
© 2007, Jane Bluestein, Ph.D., I.S.S. Publications.
Last updated on
October 16, 2006 1:44 PM
.
|