|
Excerpted and adapted from 21st Century
Discipline, revised edition, by Jane Bluestein, Ph.D. ©
1999, McGraw-Hill Children’s Publishing, Grand Rapids, MI.
Behavior Management:
Intervention Strategies
by Jane Bluestein, Ph.D.
Different types of student behavior require different interventions.
We can compound problems by applying the incorrect strategies to any student
behavior—positive or negative. The information below can help reinforce
positive behavior (without using conditional approval, or reinforcing
dependence or people-pleasing behaviors), can help motivate desirable
behaviors (without nagging or threatening), and can help intervene negative
behavior effectively and non-punitively.
Productive Student Behavior
Description: Cooperative,
positive or desirable student behavior which a student is currently exhibiting
or has already demonstrated.
Intervention Strategy: Positive
Reinforcement, Recognition
Goal: Maintaining existing
behavior, improving likelihood of behavior recurring independently.
Process:Connect the student’s
positive choice to positive outcomes.
Step 1: Describe the positive
behavior: “You put the science materials away.”
Step 2: Connect the behavior
to the positive outcome to the student: “Now you can go on
to the next activity.”
Note: Outcome (step 2) must
be need-fulfilling for the student.
Connection to Boundary: Relates
to boundary expressed before behavior occurred. For example, if you promised
dismissal after students line up quietly, once they do as you’ve
asked, you allow the positive consequence promised in the boundary to
occur. Experiencing the privilege or positive outcome as a result of their
cooperation strengthens (reinforces) the students’ cooperative behavior.
(If no boundary was usedor necessaryto elicit the cooperation,
you can still reinforce the behavior by connecting it to a positive outcome.
This action communicates conditions in implicit or unexpressed boundaries
and helps your kids make the connection between the choices they’ve
made and the positive outcomes of those choices.)
Caution: Avoid
praise that connects the student’s worth to his or her choice or
those that reinforce people-pleasing: “I like the way . . .,”
“I really like you when . . .,” “You’re so good when
. . .” or “You make me happy when . . .”
Focus on the student’s behavior and how the cooperative choice benefits
the student, not you!
______________
Non-Productive Student Behavior
Description: Neutral or non-disruptive
student behavior that is nevertheless off task (that is, student is not
doing what you’ve asked or assigned, but is not preventing teaching
or learning from occurring elsewhere).
Intervention Strategy:
Motivating with meaningful positive outcomes; offering choices
to accommodate students’ needs for power and autonomy (within limits
that protect their need for safety and security).
Goal: Eliciting
cooperative, constructive behavior from student
Process: Connecting low-probability
behavior (what you want) to high-probability behavior (what the student
wants):
Examples: “If
your work is done by noon, you can help out in the kindergarten.”
“As soon as you clear your desks and we can watch the video.”
“You may work together as long as you don’t disturb anyone.”
Note: To
be effective, motivator (outcome) must be meaningful and need fulfilling
to the child.
Connection to Boundary:
The motivating statement is the boundary, connecting what the
students want to what you want and expressing the conditions, terms or
limits under which they can have or do what they want.
_______________
Counter-Productive Student Behavior
Description: Negative
or disruptive student behavior that is interfering, in some way, with
the teaching or learning process.
Intervention Strategy:
Removing or withholding privileges or positive consequences;
holding students accountable for their behavior.
Goal: Stopping
the negative behavior and encouraging more cooperative choices; building
responsibility, accountability and self-management.
Process (dealing with
misbehavior due to uncooperative choices, lack of self-control): Interrupting
disruptive or destructive behavior. Withdrawing positive consequences
until students change their behavior (or until another time when the students
have another chance to behave more cooperatively), or until students correct,
repair, restore or replace materials or areas damaged or disarranged.
Insisting or requiring that the students change their behavior in order
to gain (or regain) access to meaningful outcomes or privileges. Accepting
the students even though you do not accept their behavior. Leaving the
door open for the student to stop and replace negative behaviors: “You
can have the book back as soon as you both agree on how you’ll share
it.”
Note: Many
misbehaviors can be avoided by getting students attention before giving
clear directions or instructions ahead of time, by making sure adequate
materials and resources are available, practicing transitions and building
independent work habits, making sure that assignments challenge students
and yet allow for achievement and success for everyone, and by physical
proximity and eye contact. Further, minimizing reactions whenever possible,
validating students’ feelings or reality, and maintaining a sense
of humor can avert many problems.
Note: If
a misbehavior or potential misbehavior is due to lack or misunderstanding
of directions, interrupt the behavior: “Stop” or “Freeze.”
Give additional information or directions, or suggest more acceptable
options, especially if the desired behavior hasn’t been requested,
clarified or practiced beforehand: “Stop. We don’t pour
paint in the trash can. Pour the paint in the sink and run the water until
you can’t see the paint anymore.”
Connection to Boundary:
Boundaries offer conditional access to positive outcomes (privileges,
meaningful activities, for example). As long as students behave in ways
that respect the conditions of the boundary, they retain the privilege
the boundary promises. As soon as those conditions are violated, the privilege
is removed. Keep in mind that removal of positive consequence depends
on availability of positive consequence, which is why a reward-oriented,
win-win environment makes this process possible and effective.
Caution: Follow-through requires
constructive action. Once previously-announced limits have been violated,
withdraw privileges immediately. Avoid warnings and reminders after the
fact. Do not ask for excuses (“why”); instead, simply restate
the boundary (or ask what the student plans to do to correct the situation).
Avoid punishing or taking responsibility for the student’s problem.
See other excerpts from 21st Century Discipline:
More information about this book
Buy this book.
Back
For a bookmark-friendly version, click here, then bookmark.
© 2008, Jane Bluestein, Ph.D., Instructional Support Services, Inc.
Last updated on
October 16, 2006 6:01 PM
|